Loyola Bioethics Institute Study Finds Medical Students Concerned About Becoming Desensitized to Dying Patients

Randi Belisomo

The imminent death of a patient is riddled with emotions for a patient and family as well as the medical team. A study based on the reflections of third-year Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine students is shedding light on the struggle physicians in training often face when trying to control their own emotions while not becoming desensitized to the needs of the dying patient and his or her family.

Click here to watch the video interview with Mark Kuczewski, PhD conducted by Randi Belisomo.


“Medical students are very aware they are undergoing a socialization process by which they become desensitized to the difficult things they see every day in the hospital. They realize this is necessary to control their emotions and focus on caring for the patients. On the other hand, they are very concerned about becoming insensitive to the spiritual, emotional and personal needs of the patient,” said Mark Kuczewski, PhD, leader author and director of the Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine Neiswanger Institute for Bioethics.

The study published in the January issue of Academic Medicine, a peer-reviewed medical journal, focused on a randomized group of Loyola third-year medical students who were asked to write an essay reflecting on their personal experience as part of a team caring for a dying patient. The students were asked to think about patient care, communication, compassionate presence and personal/professional development. The assignment was given two months into their clinical rotation and was to be completed five months later allowing the student to complete five of their required clerkships.

The essays were coded using a multistep process and content-analysis approach. A bioethicist, physician and medical school chaplain independently read and coded the essays looking for emerging themes. The team then met together to compare themes and resolve discrepancies. Four themes emerged from the 68 student responses: communication, compassionate presence, patient care and personal and professional development.

The study found that conveying the prognosis of death to patients was understandably difficult—but not just the manner in which it was conveyed, but also who conveyed it.

“Students observed how their teams delivered and explained the prognosis. Conversely they also wrote how teams avoided it,” the study reported. “Students reported no matter how well a physician communicated a prognosis, families and individual family members absorbed and digested the information in their own manner and at their own pace.”

The study also pointed out the importance of the medical team having a compassionate presence beyond routine medical interactions, such sharing interests, conveying affection or continuing to show interest in the patient after treatment had ended.

The study affirmed the importance of the medical care team understanding that a patient is body and soul, acknowledging there needs to be emotional and spiritual support for dying patients and their families.

“The students reported that some medical teams are very focused on the immediate medical problems. There is a fragmentation of medical care, such as teams rotating on and off service and patient transfers also that allows medical practitioners to avoid addressing the larger picture, death,” Kuczewski said. This same fragmentation may cause practitioner to overlook patients’ and families’ needs for information and emotional and spiritual support.

The study determined that there is a need for emotional and spiritual support for the medical students and the health care team who are facing the loss of a patient as well.

“Though some students wrote that their team acknowledged in some way the death, others felt there was no closure. The team would move on to the next patient, leaving the student with unresolved feelings,” said Kuczewski.

Finally, the study found that students struggled to avoid becoming desensitized to the human reality that their patients were experiencing while also learning to control their emotions.

“Students were aware they must temper their emotions to be patient-centered. Still, many were upset that increasingly they were ceasing to react emotionally to situations as they typically would have prior to their clinical experiences,” said Kuczweski.

The study concluded that student reflections offer insights into the ways the spiritual needs of dying patients and their families are addressed in the hospital environment. Additionally, it is a glimpse into the personal and professional development of a person as they transition from layperson to physician and the need for medical schools to develop ways to support students during this transformation.

Randi Belisomo serves as a general assignment reporter at WGN-TV and CLTV, where she began her career in 2005. She is currently a student in Loyola's Bioethics Graduate Programs.

The Faith of DREAMers

Mark Kuczewski, PhD

Remarks of Mark Kuczewski, PhD, on accepting the Moral Courage Award from Faith in Public Life. The award is presented to Loyola University Chicago in recognition of the Stritch School of Medicine becoming the first medical school in the nation to have an admissions policy that recognizes Dreamers of DACA status as eligible to apply on their merits. Click here for the news release.

“I am pleased to accept this award on behalf of Fr. Michael Garanzini, S.J., President of Loyola University Chicago, and Dr. Linda Brubaker, the Dean of the Stritch School of Medicine. Dr. Brubaker is an incredibly courageous and visionary leader. If it were not for her moral courage, there would still be no medical school in the United States whose admissions policy welcomed Dreamers to apply. That’s what you call “making a difference.”

But most of all, I want to accept this award on behalf of the many Dreamers who have shared their stories with me over the last few years. When I listen to each of them, there is a part of the story that is always similar. At some point, the Dreamer recounts having dreams of achieving a career in medicine, law, or some other way of serving their neighbors but is told by others that he or she cannot attain such things because s/he is “sin papeles.” But the Dreamer thinks that this denial of opportunity simply cannot be true. He or she then says something such as, “I thought that if I just worked hard enough and got good enough grades, something would happen. They would have to let me in.”

Every time I hear that part of the story, I am awed. I am usually reminded of the scriptural passage, “Go. Your faith has saved you.” (Luke 7:50) It is not that Dreamers need someone to take pity and heal them. It is that their faith challenges the rest of us to live up to our ideal of a faith that does justice. Their example simply calls forth a healing response within each of us.

As Dreamers have come forward with their impressive credentials and sought access to the education and training that will enable them to be physicians, we at the Stritch School of Medicine have looked at ourselves and asked if we could actually turn them away and deny their future patients the services of highly qualified, bi-lingual and bi-cultural physicians. Who are we to bar the door to them? No, we must not be blinded by the prejudices of our times. We must respond to the faith of the Dreamers with simple fairness. If we failed to do so, we would not be whom we claim to be as a Catholic and Jesuit university. The faith of the Dreamers has called forth our response: “Welcome. Your faith has saved us.”
Mark Kuczewski, PhD, is the Director of the Neiswanger Institute for Bioethics and Chair, Department of Medical Education, Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine. Dr. Kuczewski teaches Clinical Bioethics and Organizational Ethics in Loyola's Online Bioethics Graduate Programs.